Riyadh and Kabul: Strategic Calm Opening New Geopolitical Horizons

By Dr. Ubaidullah Burhani- California

254

In a region marked by growing complexity and fluid strategic alignments, the government in Kabul continues to face pronounced international isolation—particularly from Western capitals. Against this backdrop, the recent visit of a high-level delegation from the Muslim World League, led by Dr. Mohammad Al-Issa, to the Afghan capital gained significant diplomatic and political resonance. Far from being a mere ceremonial gesture, the visit conveyed calculated strategic signals and underscored a possible shift in the broader Islamic engagement with the de facto authorities in Kabul. It reflects a deliberate move toward a more structured and pragmatic engagement, rooted in responsible dialogue and aimed at advancing viable solutions to Afghanistan’s enduring political and humanitarian challenges.
1. From Isolation to Engagement: The Ascendancy of Political Realism
The timing of the visit is notable, as Islamic countries exhibit divergent stances toward the Taliban-led administration. Although the latter remains without formal international recognition, a discernible pivot toward pragmatic engagement has emerged—particularly among influential Islamic states seeking to stabilize Afghanistan and curb the risks of further isolation or ideological radicalization.
By dispatching a delegation under the auspices of the Muslim World League—a globally recognized institution operating with official Saudi backing—Riyadh has sent an unequivocal message: marginalizing the Taliban is no longer tenable. Instead, engaging with the realities on the ground, guided by religious, political, and humanitarian imperatives, is now viewed as essential. The aim is to encourage the Taliban’s gradual compliance with normative international and Islamic expectations through dialogue rather than disengagement.
2. Saudi Arabia’s Renewed Engagement: Historical Legacy and Strategic Leverage
Saudi Arabia has long been a stakeholder in Afghanistan’s trajectory. From its active support of the Afghan resistance during the Soviet occupation to its sustained humanitarian contributions, Riyadh’s involvement has been both principled and strategic.
Today, as the preeminent economic and religious power in the Muslim world—and a key global actor with strategic ties to Washington—Saudi Arabia is well-positioned to play a renewed and constructive role. Dr. Al-Issa’s visit symbolizes a calibrated return to the Afghan arena, combining religious legitimacy, financial capacity, and diplomatic weight to promote dialogue, reduce tensions, and offer a credible Islamic alternative to exclusion or militarization.
3. Multi-Level Messaging: Toward Constructive Pathways
The visit was designed to deliver layered messages to diverse audiences:
To the Taliban: Pathways to international legitimacy begin within the Islamic world. While Saudi Arabia’s posture remains conditional, it signals openness to sustained dialogue—predicated on meaningful progress in areas such as human rights, education for women and girls, inclusive governance, and counterterrorism cooperation.

To the Islamic world: A middle path exists between confrontation and passivity—embodied in institutional diplomacy led by credible Islamic actors. This approach neither legitimizes unconditionally nor abdicates accountability.
To international actors: The Islamic world is capable of shaping outcomes in Afghanistan, independently of Western frameworks. It can serve as a stabilizing force and a constructive mediator, leveraging religious diplomacy to foster inclusivity and restraint.
4. Challenges and Prospects: Navigating a Fragile Landscape
Notwithstanding the symbolic and strategic weight of this engagement, significant challenges remain. The Taliban’s willingness to adapt on fundamental governance issues—particularly those affecting women and minorities—remains uncertain. Meanwhile, Saudi Arabia may face scrutiny from Western allies, some of whom advocate preconditions for any engagement.
Resource constraints and the complexity of Afghanistan’s internal dynamics may further limit the scope of Saudi influence. Yet, this initiative could lay the groundwork for:
Gradual reintegration of Afghanistan into Islamic and international spheres through informal yet influential channels.
Launching educational, theological, and ideological programs that promote moderation and counter extremism.
Serving as a bridge between Kabul and international institutions, facilitating trust-building and conditional engagement.
Expanding humanitarian and developmental assistance to reduce suffering and bolster local resilience.
5. Geopolitical Repercussions and Regional Calculations
The broader international response to this initiative will likely be mixed. Some may interpret it as premature legitimization of the Taliban; others may view it as a pragmatic effort to foster internal reform through Islamic mediation.
Neighboring states—particularly Iran and Pakistan—will watch closely, given their direct strategic stakes in Afghan stability. The evolving Gulf posture could also impact regional alignments, particularly if Riyadh’s engagement gains traction and inspires similar initiatives by other Islamic capitals.
Crucially, the next move lies with the Taliban. The group must translate rhetoric into credible action, demonstrating a commitment to inclusive governance, human rights, and broader national reconciliation. Only then can it hope to rebuild internal legitimacy and foster constructive ties with regional and international stakeholders.
Toward a New Model of Islamic Diplomacy
This initiative must also be seen in the context of Saudi Arabia’s broader regional recalibration. Riyadh is redefining its role—from passive financial patron to proactive diplomatic actor—in conflict zones such as Yemen and Syria. The Afghan engagement occurs amid a perceived vacuum left by Western powers, allowing Saudi Arabia to step forward through the tools of religious diplomacy.
Institutions such as the Muslim World League represent Riyadh’s “soft power” strategy—projecting Islamic moderation and offering an alternative to sectarian or rigid ideological interpretations. The Taliban now faces a strategic test: whether it can engage constructively with a pluralistic and reform-oriented Islamic discourse or remain confined to insular doctrinal positions.
Moreover, the evolving Taliban–Saudi relationship is inherently complex. Riyadh’s post-2017 posture emphasizes openness and modernization—positions that may contrast with the Taliban’s traditionalist orientation. Hence, the success of Saudi outreach depends on its ability to convey reformist Islamic messages without alienating conservative audiences or undermining its regional credibility.
Conclusion: Between Isolation and Integration
The visit by the Muslim World League to Kabul marks more than a symbolic gesture; it is a calculated diplomatic intervention signaling a possible paradigm shift in the Islamic world’s engagement with Afghanistan. By advancing a strategy of “soft containment” grounded in religious legitimacy and political pragmatism, Saudi Arabia has reasserted itself as a principal actor in shaping Afghanistan’s trajectory.
This approach reflects a broader test of whether Islamic mechanisms can effectively manage political transitions and prevent the descent into extremism or irrelevance. If sustained and broadened, the initiative may serve as a cornerstone for redefining Kabul’s relationship with the Islamic world—and potentially with the international community at large.
Ultimately, this development calls for a deeper exploration of whether a coordinated and strategic Gulf initiative—building on previous models of collaboration in Syria and elsewhere—can play a decisive role in stabilizing Afghanistan. Yet the fundamental question remains: Will this emerging Saudi–Gulf posture suffice on its own, or does it require broader Arab, Islamic, and international support to be effective and enduring?
The original article was published on the White House in Arabic platform, based in Washington, D.C.

 

Support Dawat Media Center

If there were ever a time to join us, it is now. Every contribution, however big or small, powers our journalism and sustains our future. Support the Dawat Media Center from as little as $/€10 – it only takes a minute. If you can, please consider supporting us with a regular amount each month. Thank you
DNB Bank AC # 0530 2294668
Account for international payments: NO15 0530 2294 668
Vipps: #557320

  Donate Here

Support Dawat Media Center

If there were ever a time to join us, it is now. Every contribution, however big or small, powers our journalism and sustains our future. Support the Dawat Media Center from as little as $/€10 – it only takes a minute. If you can, please consider supporting us with a regular amount each month. Thank you
DNB Bank AC # 0530 2294668
Account for international payments: NO15 0530 2294 668
Vipps: #557320

Comments are closed.