From Afghanistan’s Exit to Iran’s Targets: The Grand Strategy Behind Trump’s Moves
Ahmad Fawad Arsala
When Donald Trump pulled U.S. forces out of Afghanistan, the foreign-policy establishment called it reckless. He called it a reset. From Kabul’s ruins to Alaska’s summit room, his vision is unfolding: a grand strategy to pit global powers against one another while dismantling dangerous regimes—chief among them, Iran’s.
Clearing the Decks: Afghanistan as Strategic Fuel
The Doha Agreement wasn’t a retreat, it was redirection. Trump stringently ended a war that hadn’t served his core interests. It was about freeing America to fight the battles he believed truly mattered—against China’s rise, alliances that no longer paid their share, and regional threats in the Middle East.
Alaska: Rebooting Russia to Constrain China
Now, in 2025, Trump’s quietly planning a summit in Alaska with Putin. Ukraine and Europe could wait. The calculus is unapologetically clear: lure Russia from China’s embrace, keep the world’s two superpowers partially estranged, and tilt the axis of power,on America’s terms.
Middle East Act II: A Statement Against Iran—But How Effective?
Under Operation Midnight Hammer, U.S. forces unleashed bunker-buster strikes on Iran’s nuclear sites at Fordow, Natanz, and Isfahan. Trump declared the program “totally obliterated.” Senior officials reinforced the narrative.
But recent assessments paint a more measured picture:
- Only Fordow was seriously damaged, delaying enrichment by up to two years, while the other two sites remain largely intact, capable of resuming operations in months.
- Enriched uranium may still be accessible, especially at the deeply buried Isfahan site, raising concerns about Iran’s ability to regroup.
So, the strike was significant, but hardly definitive. A setback, not an annihilation.
America First (Everywhere)
Trump’s lens is strategic, not sentimental. NATO must pay up. The Gulf must shoulder its own defense. Iran must be contained, and ideally broken, but not at the cost of endless wars. Instead, his vision is of a U.S. that punches selectively at threats, pivots quickly, and reorders global balances through disruption rather than occupation.
The Endgame, or the Gamble?
It’s a deliberate reboot:
- Exit conflicts that drain.
- Reshape alliances through disruption.
- Strike strategic targets, hard, visible, but not endless.
- Keep eyes firmly on the prize: a global contest with China, with space to maneuver—and opponents to exploit.
Whether it’s praised as bold realism or condemned as reckless theater, Trump isn’t playing by Washington’s old rulebook. He’s rewriting it, one strike, one summit, and one disrupted regime at a time.
Support Dawat Media Center
If there were ever a time to join us, it is now. Every contribution, however big or small, powers our journalism and sustains our future. Support the Dawat Media Center from as little as $/€10 – it only takes a minute. If you can, please consider supporting us with a regular amount each month. Thank you
DNB Bank AC # 0530 2294668
Account for international payments: NO15 0530 2294 668
Vipps: #557320
Support Dawat Media Center
If there were ever a time to join us, it is now. Every contribution, however big or small, powers our journalism and sustains our future. Support the Dawat Media Center from as little as $/€10 – it only takes a minute. If you can, please consider supporting us with a regular amount each month. Thank you
DNB Bank AC # 0530 2294668
Account for international payments: NO15 0530 2294 668
Vipps: #557320
Comments are closed.