The New Cold War? America’s Confrontation with China and Russia and the Future of World Order

Since the end of the Cold War, U.S. global hegemony has rested on maintaining a decisive presence in two strategic theaters: the Asia-Pacific and the Middle East.

In Asia, Washington consolidated its influence through alliances with Japan, South Korea, and Australia; by expanding basing agreements in the Philippines; and by maintaining forward military deployments and naval dominance in critical waterways such as the South China Sea. A particular priority has been deterring any attempt to change the status quo with Taiwan by force.

In the Middle East, U.S. influence has been anchored not only through strong security partnerships with Gulf states, intelligence and military cooperation with Israel, and defense agreements safeguarding the flow of energy and regional stability, but also by leveraging Egypt’s central role as the hub of Arab politics and diplomacy. Prior to 1979, Washington even cultivated a strategic partnership with Iran, which at the time was a cornerstone of the regional security order the United States sought to design.

Today, however, this balance is under severe strain. China has risen as a technologically advanced power with significant military capabilities, while Russia’s invasion of Ukraine has destabilized Europe and reshaped global energy and security dynamics. Adding to this, North Korea now asserts itself as a nuclear-armed state closely aligned with Beijing and Moscow.

These shifts were dramatically underscored on September 2 of this year, when Beijing hosted the first-ever trilateral summit of Chinese, Russian, and North Korean leaders—timed to coincide with the Shanghai Cooperation Organization meeting. This was immediately followed by China’s massive military parade, which Washington officials described as the birth of a “Disruption Axis”—a clear signal that these states intend to reset global power balances across both Asia and the Middle East.

Shifting Dynamics in the Middle East

The Middle East has already felt the ripple effects. The collapse of the Assad regime in December 2024 dealt a major blow to Russia and Iran’s strategic footprint in Syria. Yet Tehran continues to pose a formidable challenge to U.S. interests, especially through its refusal to curb its nuclear program—a trajectory increasingly viewed by Israel and the West as edging toward weaponization.

Any material or political support from Moscow, Beijing, or Pyongyang will embolden Iran, strengthening its bargaining power and enabling it to take harder, more defiant positions toward the Western alliance. These dynamics not only complicate Washington’s strategic calculus but also expand Tehran’s leverage across the region, allowing it to reinforce regional deterrence in ways favorable to its long-term ambitions.

China’s Expanding Military and Strategic Ambitions

China’s military modernization, showcased vividly during its September 3 parade, adds yet another layer of challenge to the global balance of power. The parade displayed a wide array of advanced systems: YJ-series hypersonic anti-ship missiles, intercontinental ballistic missiles, electronic warfare capabilities—all designed to deter U.S. forces and project offensive power toward Taiwan and the South China Sea.

Satellite imagery confirmed dozens of mobile launch platforms for anti-ship weapons, including hypersonic missiles aimed at neutralizing U.S. naval power in the Western Pacific. Strategic missiles such as the road-mobile DF-31AG and the heavy DF-41, both capable of carrying intercontinental warheads, were prominently featured. Submarine-launched JL-3 ballistic missiles further extend China’s capacity to reach distant targets from beneath the seas.

China also unveiled what analysts believe to be its first combat-ready stealth drone, the FH-97, designed to coordinate with manned fighters in reconnaissance, strike missions, and electronic warfare. Complementary systems included autonomous ground vehicles, surface and subsurface drones, and directed-energy weapons—markers of a shift toward AI-driven multi-domain warfare.

Beyond signaling confidence to its domestic audience, Beijing sent an unambiguous message to U.S. forces, regional partners, and rivals alike: China is a formidable Pacific power, capable of safeguarding vital energy corridors if necessary. Symbolically, the parade also coincided with the 80th anniversary of the end of World War II, a reminder of China’s self-claimed historic role in defeating Japan and reshaping the post-war order.

North Korea and Regional Security Challenges

The renewed intimacy between Beijing and Pyongyang carries profound implications for both regional and global security structures. Kim Jong Un’s appearance alongside Xi Jinping and Vladimir Putin symbolized not only a revival of Sino–North Korean ties but also Pyongyang’s ambition to be recognized as a legitimate nuclear power, rather than a pariah state.

Historically, North Korea has been a shadow player in global arms trade—supplying missile technology and conventional weapons to states such as Iran and Syria, as well as to non-state groups like Hamas, Hezbollah, and the Houthis. Examples include providing Iran with Katyusha rocket components, assisting Syria’s ballistic missile program under Assad, and indirectly enabling Houthi forces to fire Scud missiles of North Korean origin.

Washington is now alarmed by the convergence of Pyongyang’s political interests with Beijing and its growing military-technological cooperation with Moscow. Since September 2023, North Korea has supplied Russia with more than 20,000 containers of ammunition, over 100 ballistic missiles, and some 11,000 troops—openly defying multiple U.N. Security Council resolutions. North Korean artillery and missile systems, such as the KN-23, have provided as much as 40% of Russia’s battlefield munitions in Ukraine.

In exchange, Pyongyang has received battlefield experience, advanced weapon technologies, and financial backing—fueling a cycle of escalation. The consequences extend beyond East Asia: the risk of renewed North Korean nuclear assistance to the Middle East, as past involvement in Syria, Libya, and Iran demonstrates, heightens the urgency of U.S. coordination with allies to contain proliferation.

Toward a Multipolar Order

From Washington’s perspective, the convergence of China, Russia, and North Korea represents a multifaceted strategic dilemma. Pressure in one theater—such as maritime deterrence in the South China Sea—could be countered by escalation in another, such as arms transfers to the Middle East. This necessitates that the U.S. reframe its strategy not as a set of fragmented challenges but as a systemic contest with an integrated axis of revisionist powers seeking to undermine the Western-led order.

This contest extends beyond military signaling. The trilateral summit and accompanying ceremonies underscored Beijing’s growing ambition to challenge Western leadership in global affairs. Its consistent support for Iran—through continued oil purchases and refusal to enforce new sanctions—is part of a deliberate effort to weaken U.S.-led international systems and offer alternative frameworks for sanctioned states.

India adds further complexity. While China and India have long-standing border disputes and mistrust, Beijing and New Delhi recently pledged at the SCO summit to reduce tensions, resume direct flights, and treat each other as “partners, not rivals.” Yet U.S. policymakers remain wary: China’s deep investments in Pakistan, its demands over water resources, and structural trade imbalances keep distrust alive.

For Washington, India’s role is pivotal. Expanding defense and technological cooperation, joint exercises, and new bilateral initiatives highlight strategic convergence aimed at countering China. Still, the partnership is fragile, as New Delhi seeks to balance strategic autonomy with closer alignment to the U.S. Recent U.S. tariffs—50% duties on a wide range of Indian exports, imposed in response to discounted Russian oil purchases—have further strained trust.

Meanwhile, institutional alliances like the Shanghai Cooperation Organization and BRICS are evolving into pillars of a multipolar system. The SCO has expanded to include Iran and Belarus, with growing focus on economic integration, while BRICS has strategically deepened with the accession of major Middle Eastern oil exporters such as Saudi Arabia, the UAE, and Iran—multiplying its economic weight and challenging the dollar-centric global financial order.

U.S. Strategy in the Age of Multipolar Competition

Despite talk of a “Disruption Axis” binding China, Russia, and North Korea, internal contradictions limit the cohesion of this bloc. Sino-Indian rivalry, residual mistrust between Beijing and Pyongyang, and Russia’s growing dominance in North Korea complicate the partnership’s stability. These fissures present opportunities for Washington to exploit through calibrated engagement.

The U.S. can strengthen India’s hand against China, provide security assurances, and deepen intelligence-sharing. It can bolster NATO unity while supporting Ukraine’s resilience, signaling that transatlantic solidarity remains unshaken. Rather than punitive trade measures against partners like India, Washington should prioritize multilateral frameworks such as the Quad (with Japan, India, and Australia), while offering tangible incentives in technology, trade, and infrastructure.

In the Middle East, Washington must recalibrate its approach to restore credibility among Arab partners. This requires engaging Gulf states, Egypt, Jordan, Turkey, and European allies in crafting a just and durable resolution to the Arab–Israeli conflict. That means conditioning military aid to Israel, demanding humanitarian relief, and outlining a viable roadmap toward a two-state solution—actions that would mitigate instability and strengthen America’s moral standing in the Arab world.

Ultimately, the United States must adopt a holistic strategy that integrates alliance management, economic statecraft, and credible diplomacy. Only by doing so can it sustain its strategic presence, uphold Western values, and navigate the emerging multipolar order in which rival coalitions seek to rewrite the rules of global governance.

Support Dawat Media Center

If there were ever a time to join us, it is now. Every contribution, however big or small, powers our journalism and sustains our future. Support the Dawat Media Center from as little as $/€10 – it only takes a minute. If you can, please consider supporting us with a regular amount each month. Thank you
DNB Bank AC # 0530 2294668
Account for international payments: NO15 0530 2294 668
Vipps: #557320

  Donate Here