At a Crossroads: Will Ethiopia and Eritrea Choose Peace or Peril?

” ‘Ethiopia and Eritrea at a critical crossroads’ has never been more pertinent. Two years after a historic peace deal ended a bloody, decades-long stalemate, the relationship between the two nations is entering a new and uncertain phase. The path forward is bifurcated: one leads toward deepened economic integration, regional stability, and lasting peace, while the other risks a backslide into renewed tension, fueled by unresolved border disputes, shifting regional alliances, and the absence of a formalized political framework.”

In the Horn of Africa, where international interests converge and the paths of history intertwine with rugged geography, Eritrea and Ethiopia face a complex dilemma. It is the story of two neighbors bound by blood and memory, yet divided by sea and mountain. One nation, Eritrea, possesses a long coastline but lives in isolation; the other, Ethiopia, is a regional power but remains landlocked, its lack of sea access a persistent strategic wound.

The Red Sea is not merely a line on a map; it is a strategic artery controlling global trade and regional security. For Eritreans, the sea represents their identity and their sole window to the world. For Ethiopians, the inherited complex of being a “landlocked state” has made geography an open wound that has fueled their strategic choices for generations, from the annexation of Eritrea under Haile Selassie to the present day.

The irony is profound. Ethiopia, which defeated Italian colonialism at the Battle of Adwa in 1896, has never been able to overcome its geographical confinement. Meanwhile, Eritrea, which won its independence after a long war of liberation, has been unable to turn the sea into a gateway for openness; instead, its coastline has become a border that deepens its isolation.

A Lost Opportunity and a Legacy of Conflict

In 1952, the United Nations granted Eritrea a federal status with Ethiopia—an arrangement that could have established a unique coexistence, uniting the sea with the highlands. However, Haile Selassie’s decision to fully annex Eritrea in 1962 opened the door to a thirty-year war of liberation. In that moment, both sides lost the opportunity to build a multi-ethnic state, inheriting instead a legacy of hostility and bloodshed.

The military victory in 1991, followed by formal independence in 1993, were pivotal moments. The first was about dignity and military triumph, the second about international legitimacy and sovereignty. Yet, the moment of independence did not translate into a democratic project or an economic renaissance. Instead, Eritrea descended into international isolation, relying on the militarization of society and endless youth conscription, driving hundreds of thousands to migrate and seek asylum.

The conflict did not end with independence. The Badme War (1998-2000) between the two nations demonstrated that the “border wound” had not healed and that the sea had not resolved the highlands’ complex. Since then, peace attempts have been repeated, but never with full success.

In 2018, the signing of a peace agreement by Ethiopian Prime Minister Abiy Ahmed and Eritrean President Isaias Afwerki was a notable event, reopening the border and raising hopes for a new beginning. However, these hopes quickly evaporated with the outbreak of the Tigray War (2020-2022), in which Eritrean forces fought alongside the Ethiopian army, returning the relationship to a state of tension.

The Current Stakes: Beyond a Bilateral Dispute

Today, the rift between Eritrea and Ethiopia is no longer just a bilateral issue. The Red Sea has become an arena of regional and international competition. This rivalry is reshaping the equation: Eritrea is no longer seen as just a small coastal state, while Ethiopia views direct sea access as an urgent, non-negotiable strategic necessity.

With every escalatory step, the specter of renewed war looms. Recent international reports have warned of the potential for a new confrontation. What is striking is that despite their differences, the two countries share a major crisis: both have failed to turn their geographical positions into a positive force. Eritrea liberated the sea but failed to transform it into a platform for development and openness. Ethiopia achieved a broad regional presence but found no solution to its geographical complex. In the process, both peoples have lost decades of development and stability.

The Path Forward: Cooperation or Perpetual Conflict?

The history of the Horn of Africa is filled with wasted opportunities and heavy prices paid due to a misreading of geography and history. Today, the two nations stand at a new crossroads: they can either recognize that their common interests are stronger than the conflicts of the past, or they can succumb to reproducing an old conflict in a new form, turning the Red Sea from a potential window for cooperation into an endless arena of clash.

However, if Eritrea and Ethiopia choose cooperation over confrontation, the door would open to immense economic gains for both. Ethiopia, with its population of over 120 million, represents a massive market capable of revitalizing Eritrean ports and transforming them into regional supply hubs. In turn, Eritrea could evolve from a marginalized state into a commercial nexus on the Red Sea, benefiting from infrastructure investments and reclaiming its historical position as the Horn of Africa’s gateway to the world.

Economic integration is not a luxury but an urgent necessity. Ethiopia suffers from a severe foreign currency crisis and mounting debt, relying heavily on the port of Djibouti, which drains its resources with high transit fees. Eritrea, meanwhile, lives in stifling economic isolation, broken only by financial remittances from its diaspora. If the two countries cooperate, the region could witness a boom in transport, trade, energy, and even tourism, which has long been held hostage by security tensions.

Yet the greatest challenge is not purely economic, but fundamentally political. Integration requires trust, and trust demands a political will that transcends the obsessions of the past. The two nations need leaders with the courage to shift from a rhetoric of historical rights and geographical revenge to a language of shared interests and mutual gains. Only then can geography be transformed from a curse into an opportunity.

A Lesson from History: The European Example

Perhaps the European experience offers a lesson worth contemplating. England and France fought the Hundred Years’ War (1337-1453), a prolonged conflict that drained their strength, devastated their economies, and immersed successive generations in enmity and hatred. This war was even longer and more devastating than the thirty-year conflict Eritrea and Ethiopia waged in the latter half of the 20th century.

What distinguished Europe later was its refusal to remain a prisoner to the memory of bloodshed. Over time, England and France realized that continued conflict wasted resources and prevented renaissance, while investing in the economy and integration opened the doors to power. Indeed, when the trajectory of their relationship shifted from conflict to cooperation, they became central powers in Europe and the world. Instead of remaining perpetual enemies, they became partners in building the European Union and allies in the modern international system. Through this strategic shift, they ascended from a devastating battlefield to a center of political, economic, and cultural influence.

The comparison with the Horn of Africa reveals the difference in choices. Eritrea and Ethiopia inherited a bloody conflict that lasted thirty years, yet to this day, they remain trapped in a cycle of tensions and suspicions. In contrast, they could—like England and France—have transformed the wounds of the past into a foundation for economic and political integration. Eritrea’s ports could be a lifeline for Ethiopia, and Ethiopian markets could be a bridge to revitalizing the Eritrean economy. But this future remains contingent on the ability of their leaders to recognize that the interests of their peoples are not achieved on battlefields, but through economic and developmental projects.

History, therefore, is not merely a narrative of tragedies, but a school for learning alternatives. Europe, which was consumed by the Hundred Years’ War, has today become a symbol of economic and political unity. The pressing question remains: Will the neighbors of the sea and the mountain dare to learn this lesson, prioritizing common interests over the legacy of wars? Or will they leave the Red Sea as an open theater for an old conflict, perpetually reproduced in new forms?

The decision ultimately rests with Addis Ababa and Asmara: Will they continue to orbit the past, or will they forge a new model for the coexistence of sea and mountain in the Horn of Africa?

Support Dawat Media Center

If there were ever a time to join us, it is now. Every contribution, however big or small, powers our journalism and sustains our future. Support the Dawat Media Center from as little as $/€10 – it only takes a minute. If you can, please consider supporting us with a regular amount each month. Thank you
DNB Bank AC # 0530 2294668
Account for international payments: NO15 0530 2294 668
Vipps: #557320

  Donate Here