After Gaza: How Peace Could Trigger the Fall of Iran’s Regime and Pressure Russia to End Its War

The recently brokered Gaza peace deal, spearheaded through what has been termed Trump’s Twenty-Point Framework,  marks not just an end to one of the most brutal modern wars between Israel and Hamas, but also a potential realignment of global power. As the guns fall silent in Gaza, the strategic consequences extend far beyond the Mediterranean coast. The deal’s most profound ripple effect may be the reallocation of Western and regional power resources,  a shift that could ultimately embolden efforts to destabilize Iran’s clerical regime and pressure Russia into a negotiated end to its ongoing war in Ukraine.

1. The Peace Deal as a Strategic Release Valve

As the reports of events indicate, the Gaza peace deal includes a ceasefire, a hostage-prisoner exchange, and phased reconstruction under regional and international oversight , with Saudi Arabia, Egypt, and the U.S. playing key guarantor roles. Beyond the humanitarian relief, the end of the Gaza war represents the freeing of immense political and military bandwidth for both Israel and its Western allies.

For Washington, which has been juggling simultaneous crises in Europe, the Middle East, and the Indo-Pacific, the ceasefire removes a constant flashpoint that consumed diplomatic energy, divided allies, and emboldened adversaries. For Israel, it restores strategic flexibility , allowing focus on the north, where Hezbollah and Iran’s Revolutionary Guard proxies remain active, and beyond that, on the broader containment of Tehran’s regional network.

2. The Iranian Regime: From Regional Manipulator to Vulnerable Target

Iran’s clerical leadership has long thrived on conflict management,  sustaining asymmetric wars through proxies rather than direct confrontation. However, as the Gaza front quiets and Israel’s attention shifts, Iran’s insulation may weaken. Analysis notes that the deal involves regional normalization pathways, potentially including Saudi-Israeli coordination once the ceasefire stabilizes. This could represent Tehran’s nightmare scenario: a consolidated Arab-Israeli security axis backed by U.S. and European resources.

Moreover, a post-Gaza environment allows Western intelligence, cyber, and defense assets ,  previously tied down by escalation risks , to refocus on Iran’s internal vulnerabilities. Economic stagnation, generational discontent, and rising anti-clerical sentiment already strain the regime. With the proxy war in Gaza paused, pressure could mount through covert support to domestic opposition movements and precision strikes against IRGC assets in Syria and Iraq, reducing Iran’s regional reach and destabilizing the regime’s command structure.

3. The Russia Connection: Strategic Linkage Across Theaters

While seemingly distant, the dynamics of the Gaza peace accord and the war in Ukraine are tightly interwoven. Russia and Iran are tactical partners,  bound by shared hostility toward the West and mutual dependency in military technology and sanctions evasion. A weakened Tehran, preoccupied with internal unrest or facing direct confrontation, would deprive Moscow of a critical supplier of drones, munitions, and sanction-busting channels.

Furthermore, with the Gaza war concluded, Western capitals can recalibrate their political capital toward intensifying pressure on the Kremlin. The moral and diplomatic exhaustion that the Middle East war generated in Western societies has been one of Moscow’s quiet strategic gains. A restored focus and reenergized coalition could translate into greater military aid to Ukraine and deeper sanctions coordination,  tightening the noose on Russia’s war economy.

4. The New Geopolitical Equation

The peace in Gaza could paradoxically create the conditions for broader conflict,  but not necessarily between states. It may catalyze the unraveling of two regimes that have long thrived on chaos: the Iranian theocracy and the Putin system in Russia. With Western and regional powers freed from the distraction of the Gaza war, strategic focus can shift toward confronting authoritarian nodes rather than managing crises they exploit.

Should Israel and the Arab states move in tandem, and the U.S. reasserts a doctrine of decisive pressure on revisionist powers, 2025 may mark not just a Middle East truce,  but the beginning of an era of intensified regime pressure campaigns. The mullahs in Tehran, long sheltered by the fog of proxy wars, may soon find themselves exposed. And in Moscow, Vladimir Putin could face a newly unified front, no longer constrained by Middle Eastern turmoil.

Conclusion

The Gaza peace deal, therefore, is more than a ceasefire; it’s a strategic reset. It frees diplomatic, military, and moral resources for a West eager to reassert control over global stability. As peace descends on Gaza’s ruins, the next flashpoint may rise elsewhere,  in Tehran or Moscow,  where the stakes are far greater, and the outcomes could reshape the balance of power for decades.

The Collapse of “Strategic Depth”: How Pakistan’s Jihad Doctrine Undermined Its Statecraft

Support Dawat Media Center

If there were ever a time to join us, it is now. Every contribution, however big or small, powers our journalism and sustains our future. Support the Dawat Media Center from as little as $/€10 – it only takes a minute. If you can, please consider supporting us with a regular amount each month. Thank you
DNB Bank AC # 0530 2294668
Account for international payments: NO15 0530 2294 668
Vipps: #557320

  Donate Here