French Far-Right Activist Charged with Hate Speech After Anti-Afghan TikTok Goes Viral

ANGERS, France – A prominent French far-right activist is facing criminal charges for inciting racial hatred following the publication of a viral TikTok video targeting a group of Afghan refugees, a case that has reignited a fierce national debate over the limits of free speech and the rise of anti-migrant sentiment.

Jean-Audes Gannat, 31, a former leader of the now-dissolved identity group “Aurélien,” was formally charged by French prosecutors on Tuesday after a 24-second clip he posted amassed hundreds of thousands of views. The video, filmed in the western village of Sègre-en-Anjou Bleu, shows a group of Afghan men outside a supermarket and is captioned, “Tired of living with the Taliban’s cousins.”

From Viral Video to Criminal Charge

In the footage, Gannat can be heard accusing the Afghan asylum seekers of “doing nothing” and “wandering the town daily.” According to the public prosecutor’s office in Angers, these remarks, combined with the inflammatory caption, were not merely opinion but constituted a clear incitement to racial hatred, a criminal offense under France’s strict hate speech laws.

Following a complaint from a local anti-racism association, Gannat was taken into custody for questioning. After 24 hours, he was presented before a judge, formally charged, and placed under judicial supervision pending his trial, which is scheduled for May 6, 2026.

A History of Extremism and Legal Trouble

This is not Gannat’s first encounter with the law. Prosecutors highlighted his previous conviction in 2023 for public defamation against a state official. Furthermore, his former group, Aurélien, was officially banned by the French Interior Ministry in 2021 for “inciting hatred, violence, and discrimination” and promoting an extremist ideology that posed a “threat to public order.”

This history paints a picture of an activist long involved in the fringes of the French far-right movement, which often blends nationalism with anti-immigration and anti-Islam rhetoric.

The Defense: “Telling the Truth is Now Forbidden”

In a video posted just before his arrest, Gannat struck a defiant tone. “Telling the truth is now forbidden,” he claimed, framing the legal action as an act of political censorship by the French state. His lawyer, Mathieu Sassi, has echoed this sentiment, stating that the case represents “a troubling step toward silencing dissent” and conflating Gannat’s rhetoric with legitimate political discourse.

A Nation Divided Online and On the Ground

The case has sparked intense reactions across social media and in French media. Supporters of Gannat launched an online fundraiser to cover his legal fees, which rapidly gathered over €9,000, signaling significant backing within certain segments of the population.

However, the incident has also drawn sharp criticism. Local officials in Sègre have expressed frustration that the actions of one activist have misrepresented their community, which has been working to integrate a small number of Afghan refugees. “This video does not reflect the reality of our community’s efforts or the behavior of the refugees placed here,” said one local councilor, who asked not to be named due to the sensitive nature of the topic.

Broader Context: Rural France and the Politics of Migration

The charges against Gannat touch on a raw nerve in France. While large cities have long been hubs of immigration, the dispersal of asylum seekers to rural towns and villages—part of a national policy to relieve pressure on urban centers—has sometimes led to cultural friction and become a focal point for far-right groups. These groups often portray the policy as a forced “invasion” of traditional French heartlands, a narrative Gannat’s video directly exploited.

The case against Jean-Audes Gannat is now poised to become a flashpoint in the ongoing struggle to balance the fundamental right to free expression with the imperative to protect vulnerable minorities from hate speech and incitement. As the 2026 trial date looms, it ensures that this complex debate will remain at the forefront of France’s political and social landscape.

  Donate Here