Prolonged Border Shutdown Between Pakistan and Afghanistan Inflicts Deepening Economic and Humanitarian Toll

Islamabad/Kabul – A crippling three-week closure of all major border crossings between Pakistan and Afghanistan has escalated into a severe economic and humanitarian crisis, inflicting trade losses surpassing $200 million, stranding thousands of trucks, and triggering sharp price hikes in essential commodities within Afghanistan.

The border standstill began in early October following a series of deadly clashes between security forces from both nations. In response, Islamabad shut down all eight official crossing points, including the vital Torkham and Chaman crossings—two of South Asia’s most critical commercial arteries. What began as a security measure has now morphed into a protracted economic blockade, bringing cross-border trade to a near-total halt.

Mounting Losses and Stranded Cargo

According to joint chambers of commerce and business sources, the direct financial impact is staggering. The initial period from October 12 to 31 alone saw direct losses of approximately $50 million. As the closure extends into its fourth week, cumulative losses to bilateral trade have now surged to nearly $200 million.

The physical manifestation of this crisis is visible at the border terminals, where over 3,000 trucks are stranded in massive queues. Their cargo—a mix of perishable fruits and vegetables, fuel tankers, and construction materials—is rapidly spoiling or becoming inaccessible, compounding losses for traders on both sides.

“Every day the border remains closed, I am losing thousands of dollars in perishable goods that are simply rotting in the sun,” said Ahmed Shah, a Pakistani fruit exporter based in Peshawar. “This isn’t just a business loss; it’s a catastrophe for everyone involved in this trade chain.”

Broader Economic Fallout and Regional Ripple Effects

The disruption strikes at the heart of a deeply interconnected economic relationship. Prior to the shutdown, official data indicated that Afghanistan imported roughly $150 million worth of goods monthly from Pakistan, including essential items like food, medicine, and petroleum. In return, Afghanistan exported about $60 million worth of goods, primarily fresh produce and minerals like talc and marble.

The closure has effectively severed these flows. However, the damage extends far beyond direct bilateral trade. Pakistan’s strategic ambition to access markets in Central Asia via Afghanistan—a key component of its regional trade policy—has been severely compromised. The Afghanistan-Pakistan Transit Trade Agreement (APTTA) is now inoperative, blocking a crucial corridor for Pakistani goods.

“The closure is a double blow,” explained Dr. Ameena Khan, a regional economist at the Islamabad Institute for Policy Studies. “It immediately harms local businesses and traders in both countries, but it also damages Pakistan’s credibility as a reliable trade route to Central Asia. International partners and investors are watching.”

Deepening Humanitarian Crisis in Afghanistan

Inside Afghanistan, the consequences are particularly acute. Border provinces are experiencing severe shortages of essential goods. Local markets have reported price spikes of up to 30-40% for staples like flour, cooking oil, and fuel.

“For ordinary Afghans, this is not about trade statistics; it is about survival,” said a representative from a Kandahar-based traders’ union, who requested anonymity. “Families are struggling to afford basic food items. The closure is collectively punishing the Afghan people for a political dispute.”

The Taliban-led government, which relies heavily on cross-border customs duties for revenue, faces a further squeeze on its already fragile economy. The suspension of Afghan exports also means farmers and miners are losing their primary income stream, exacerbating an unemployment crisis.

Political Stalemate and Calls for De-escalation

Despite the escalating costs, a political resolution remains elusive. Both sides have engaged in diplomatic talks but have yet to announce a breakthrough. The core issues fueling the tensions—including disputes over border management, recognition of the Durand Line, and recent cross-border militant attacks—remain unresolved.

Regional analysts warn that the longer the deadlock persists, the more lasting the damage to bilateral relations will be.

“This tit-for-tat closure strategy is a lose-lose proposition,” said Michael Kugelman, Director of the South Asia Institute at the Wilson Center. “It inflicts immediate economic pain, but it also erodes the foundational trust required for long-term regional stability and economic integration. A swift de-escalation is in everyone’s interest.”

As merchants plead for the release of stranded goods and economists warn of long-term strategic losses, the pressure is mounting on both governments to find a face-saving solution. The reopening of the borders is now seen not just as an economic imperative, but a critical step toward preventing a deeper humanitarian crisis in the region.

  Donate Here