The Two Pillars: How Dharmendra and Amitabh Bachchan Defined 1970s Bollywood

To compare Dharmendra and Amitabh Bachchan is to explore the very soul of 1970s Hindi cinema. They were not just stars; they were archetypes, representing two distinct, powerful currents of masculinity and stardom that captivated a nation. One was the personification of earthy, relatable charm, while the other was the embodiment of brooding, revolutionary intensity. Together, they didn’t just share the screen—they built its most iconic landmarks.

The Persona: The Charmer and the Storm

Dharmendra was the “He-Man” with a heart of gold. His appeal was visceral and immediate. With his breathtakingly handsome features and an open, gregarious smile, he seemed friendly and accessible, the boy-next-door who just happened to be a movie star. He once described himself as “a very emotional person. If someone smiles at me, I instinctively hug them. I can’t help it. I was made like that.” This innate warmth translated seamlessly onto the screen, making him a hero audiences felt they could befriend.

Amitabh Bachchan, in stark contrast, was the “Angry Young Man.” His persona was built around a simmering intensity, supercharged emotional conflicts, and a towering presence that commanded awe. He was a vessel for the frustrations of a disillusioned generation. With one piercing stare, he could convey a universe of pain and rebellion, his silences speaking volumes more than dialogues ever could. He wasn’t just an actor; he was a phenomenon, a larger-than-life figure who internalized the nation’s angst.

The Craft: Instinct vs. Intensity

Their acting styles were as different as their personalities. Dharmendra’s method was intuitive and emotional. He excelled in a rare and versatile mix of action, romance, and comedy. In a rugged action film like Maa, he was utterly convincing, yet he could shed that persona to play the quiet, compassionate poet in Anupama with soulful sensitivity. His comic timing was superb, as evidenced in Hrishikesh Mukherjee’s Chupke Chupke, where he admitted his own nature was very similar to the prankster-professor he played. When he romanced, whether with Hema Malini in Sholay or Sharmila Tagore in Anupama, it felt natural and gentle.

Amitabh, while capable of great romance (Kabhi Kabhie, Silsila) and unforgettable comedy (Amar Akbar Anthony), always carried his core intensity with him. His romantic scenes were deeply felt, often tragic or fraught with unspoken tension. His dramatic power, however, was his true forte. Directors like Yash Chopra and Prakash Mehra harnessed this to create a new type of hero—complex, anti-establishment, and fiercely confident. In this, he was often compared to Dilip Kumar for his ability to convey profound depth with stillness, with filmmaker Shyam Benegal once rating him second only to the thespian.

The Partnership and the Paths: Sholay and Beyond

Their collaboration in Sholay (1975) remains the most iconic pairing in Bollywood history, a perfect synergy of their contrasting energies. Interestingly, Amitabh himself revealed that it was Dharmendra who secured him the role. “Dharam-ji got me the role for Sholay. He was already in the film. I asked him to put in a word for me and that’s how I got the role in the epochal film,” Bachchan recounted—a testament to the camaraderie that transcended competition.

However, their career trajectories post their peak reveal a key difference in longevity. Amitabh Bachchan masterfully reinvented himself across decades: the Angry Young Man of the 70s, the mainstream megastar of the 80s (Coolie, Shahenshah), and from the 2000s onward, a character actor of immense depth and gravitas in films like Black, Piku, and Pink. He evolved with his audience and the times.

Dharmendra, in this respect, found reinvention more challenging. While he delivered powerful performances in later years (like in Life in a… Metro), his on-screen persona in middle age often became predictable, sometimes veering into self-parody, with his famous “Kutte, Kaminey” dialogue becoming a subject of mimicry. He remained a beloved figure, but his artistic evolution was not as pronounced as Bachchan’s.

The Legacy: Two Sides of a Golden Coin

So, who had more star power? The question is almost irrelevant, for they ruled different kingdoms of the heart.

Dharmendra’s Legacy is one of effortless charm, unparalleled versatility, and pure, unadulterated star power. From the social drama of Satyakam (which he considers his most significant work) to the swashbuckling Dharam Veer, the dramatic twin saga Seeta Aur Geeta, and the blockbuster romance Jugnu, he proved there was no genre he couldn’t conquer. He was the ultimate “handsome hero,” whose appeal was acknowledged even by his contemporaries; Jaya Bachchan, then Jaya Bhaduri, was a known admirer, a fact playfully referenced in their film Guddi.

Amitabh Bachchan’s Legacy is that of a cultural reset. He didn’t just play roles; he created an archetype that redefined Indian masculinity and heroism for a generation. His films—Zanjeer, Deewar, Shakti, Don—are not just movies; they are chapters in the cultural history of India. He exerted a greater societal impact, with more iconic monologues and scenes that are etched permanently in public memory. His career is a masterclass in sustained relevance.

In conclusion, both are legends, each in his own irreplaceable way. Dharmendra, the lovable “Garam Dharam,” captured the audience’s heart with his warmth and versatility. Amitabh Bachchan, the formidable “Big B,” left them speechless with veneration for his commanding presence and transformative power. One was the hero you wanted to have a drink with; the other was the hero you would follow into a revolution. Together, they were the two pillars that held up the golden era of Bollywood.

 

 

  Donate Here