Categories: News & Reports

U.S. Veterans Defend Afghan Allies, Urge Against Collective Blame After Isolated Shooting

A deadly shooting near the White House, allegedly committed by an Afghan evacuee, has intensified political scrutiny over the U.S. refugee resettlement program even as American military veterans mount a forceful defense of their former allies, pleading for fairness and nuance.

The incident, which resulted in the death of a U.S. National Guard member and the injury of two others on November 25, has triggered a fresh and heated debate. Former U.S. Special Forces operatives, intelligence officials, and veterans of the two-decade war in Afghanistan are urging the public and policymakers not to generalize or blame the broader community of Afghan evacuees.

“This is a tragic criminal act by one individual. It is not an indictment of an entire community that served, bled, and sacrificed alongside us for twenty years,” said a former Army captain who served multiple tours in Afghanistan and worked closely with Afghan interpreters. “To paint them all with a broad brush of suspicion is a betrayal of our shared mission and our own values.”

The suspect, identified as 29-year-old Afghan national Rahmanullah Lakhanwal, was evacuated during the chaotic U.S. withdrawal in August 2021. He has been charged with murder and attempted murder after appearing in court via video from a hospital bed. The details of his background and a possible motive remain under investigation.

Veterans Highlight Critical Role, Warn of Lasting Damage

Former defense and intelligence officials interviewed by NBC News stressed that Afghan partners were indispensable to U.S. counterterrorism and military operations, often at extreme personal risk to themselves and their families.

“Without these allies, our mission would have been immeasurably more difficult and costly in American lives,” a former CIA officer stated. “If we now label the entire resettled population a security threat, we send a devastating message to any potential partner in future conflicts: America’s promise of protection is fleeting and conditional.”

Political Reaction Fuels Anxiety Among Evacuees

The case has drawn swift political reaction, further alarming the approximately 76,000 Afghans resettled in the U.S. since the Taliban takeover. Former President Donald Trump called for a “full review” of all evacuated Afghans’ records. Some lawmakers have echoed this, proposing stricter screening measures and casting doubt on the existing rigorous, multi-layer vetting process conducted overseas before arrival.

This rhetoric heightens the existing anxieties of a community already facing severe challenges. Many evacuees—including former commandos, interpreters, activists, and journalists—fled imminent Taliban reprisals. They now grapple with legal limbo under temporary humanitarian parole, high unemployment, untreated trauma, and limited access to healthcare and social services.

Advocates: An Isolated Case Amid a Humanitarian Crisis

Veterans’ groups and advocacy organizations emphasize that the shooting, while horrific, is an isolated criminal case. They argue it should not be leveraged to justify broad suspicion or policy rollbacks affecting tens of thousands who are legally present and struggling to rebuild their lives.

“We cannot allow one act to undermine one of the few honorable components of the war’s end—keeping faith with those who kept faith with us,” said the head of a nonprofit supporting resettled Afghan interpreters. “The vast majority of these newcomers are deeply grateful for safety and are striving to become contributing members of American society. They deserve our support, not our suspicion.”

The debate underscores a painful dichotomy: the imperative for national security and thorough vetting versus the moral and strategic obligation to those who served alongside American troops. For the veterans advocating on their behalf, the principle is clear: the United States must honor its debts and distinguish between individual crime and collective character.