Australian Senator Sparks Outrage After Wearing Burqa in Parliament to Push for Ban

In a provocative political stunt that halted parliamentary proceedings, Australian far-right Senator Pauline Hanson wore a full-face burqa into the Senate on Monday, defiantly illustrating her push to ban the garment in public. The act, which she framed as a protest, was immediately condemned as a “racist” and “disgraceful” spectacle that targeted the Muslim community.

The incident unfolded shortly after Hanson was blocked from introducing a private member’s bill that sought to outlaw burqas and other full-face coverings in all public places across Australia. Returning to the chamber shrouded in the black niqab—a garment that reveals only the eyes—Hanson refused requests from the Senate President to remove it, forcing an unprecedented suspension of the day’s business.

A Chamber Erupts in Condemnation

The Senate erupted in anger as Hanson took her seat. Mehreen Faruqi, Australia’s first Muslim female senator from the Greens party, did not mince words, stating, “This is a racist senator, displaying blatant racism.” She later added that the stunt was designed to “vilify and marginalize the Muslim community for cheap political gain.”

Independent Senator Fatima Payman, another Muslim lawmaker, called the act “disgraceful,” emphasizing that it mocked a religious practice and furthered division.

The condemnation was bipartisan. Penny Wong, leader of the government in the Senate, labeled Hanson’s actions “not worthy of a member of the Australian Senate” and moved a motion to suspend her. Anne Ruston, deputy leader for the opposition coalition, also voiced disapproval, stating that such stunts undermined the dignity of the parliament.

A History of Controversy and Political Strategy

For Pauline Hanson, this is familiar territory. The Queensland senator first rose to national prominence in the 1990s with her strident opposition to Asian immigration and asylum seekers. Throughout her political career, she has consistently campaigned against Islamic practices, with the burqa a frequent target. This week’s demonstration was a near-identical replay of a 2017 incident, where she also wore a burqa in the Senate to call for a national ban.

Her party, One Nation, has capitalized on rising support for far-right, anti-immigration policies. The party secured two additional Senate seats in May’s general election, bringing its total to four and amplifying Hanson’s platform.

The Debate: Security, Symbolism, and Free Expression

In a statement posted on Facebook following the incident, Hanson defended her actions. “So if the Parliament won’t ban it, I will display this oppressive, radical, non-religious head garb that risks our national security and the ill-treatment of women on the floor of our parliament so that every Australian knows what’s at stake,” she wrote. Her argument rests on two common points used by proponents of such bans: national security, suggesting full-face coverings could be used to conceal identity for malicious purposes, and women’s rights, framing the garment as inherently oppressive.

However, critics were quick to dismantle these justifications.

• A Marginal Practice: Opponents of the ban note that only an extremely small fraction of Muslim women in Australia wear the burqa or niqab. The Australian National Imams Council has repeatedly stated that face coverings are not a religious requirement in Islam.

• Co-opting Feminist Discourse: Muslim advocates argue that Hanson’s purported concern for women’s rights is disingenuous. “True empowerment means giving women the choice, not legislating what they can and cannot wear,” said a spokesperson for the Islamic Council of Victoria. “This performance wasn’t about liberating women; it was about exploiting xenophobia.”

• Security Pretext: Security experts point out that Australia already has laws allowing authorities to require the removal of face coverings for identification purposes in sensitive areas like airports and banks, making a blanket ban unnecessary.

Broader Implications

The stunt has reignited a painful and recurring debate in Australia about multiculturalism, religious freedom, and the limits of political expression. While Hanson’s bill has virtually no chance of passing, her action ensures the issue remains in the headlines, solidifying her support base and forcing a public conversation on her terms.

For Australia’s Muslim community, which makes up about 3.2% of the population, the event is seen as another public denigration of their faith and a reinforcement of harmful stereotypes. As the Senate resumes its work, the fallout from Hanson’s protest continues, highlighting the deep cultural and political divisions that persist in the nation.

  Donate Here