A Trophy Unclaimed: How Geopolitics Overshadowed India’s Asia Cup Victory

The Indian cricket team’s hard-fought victory in the Asia Cup final was dramatically overshadowed on Sunday when they refused to accept the championship trophy, a stunning protest against the official presenting it: Pakistani Interior Minister Mohsin Naqvi.

The incident in Dubai was the culmination of weeks of escalating political tensions scorching the world of sports, demonstrating how the deep-seated rivalry between India and Pakistan continues to defy the traditional boundaries of the cricket pitch.

The Unprecedented Snub: A Trophy in Limbo

The match itself ended with a five-wicket victory for India, but the award ceremony descended into confusion. While the game concluded around 10:30 PM, the presentation was delayed for over an hour. Television footage showed Naqvi, who is also the President of the Asian Cricket Council (ACC) and Chairman of the Pakistan Cricket Board (PCB), in discussions with match officials.

The tension became palpable when, just before the ceremony began, an official removed the Asia Cup champions trophy from the dais without explanation. The Indian players—Kuldeep Yadav, Abhishek Sharma, and Tilak Varma—collected their individual awards from other dignitaries, pointedly ignoring Naqvi, who stood on the stage. The Pakistani minister, in turn, did not applaud the Indian players.

The climax came when New Zealand’s former cricketer Simon Doull, hosting the ceremony, announced, “I have been informed by the Asian Cricket Council that the Indian cricket team will not be collecting their awards tonight.” The ceremony was abruptly concluded, leaving the Indian team to celebrate their title win by miming the act of holding a trophy.

The Official Stance: A Political Line in the Sand

The Board of Control for Cricket in India (BCCI) was quick to clarify its position. “We have decided not to take the Asia Cup trophy from the ACC chairman, who happens to be one of the main [political] leaders of Pakistan,” BCCI chairman Devajit Saikia told ANI news agency.

He sought to downplay the diplomatic awkwardness, adding, “That does not mean that the gentleman will take away the trophy with him along with the medals. So it is very unfortunate and we hope that the trophy and the medals will be returned to India as soon as possible.”

Indian captain Suryakumar Yadav expressed the team’s frustration, stating, “I think this is one thing which I have never seen since I started playing cricket… that a champion team is denied a trophy, that too a hard-earned one. I feel we deserved it.” He emphasized that the decision was the team’s own, made without external instruction.

A Tournament Marred by Rising Tensions

The trophy refusal was not an isolated incident, but the peak of hostilities that had been building throughout the Asia Cup.

• The Political Backdrop: The tournament occurred just four months after a short but intense aerial conflict between the two nations, triggered by a deadly terrorist attack on tourists in Pahalgam, in Indian-administered Kashmir, on April 22. India blamed Pakistan-based militants, leading to a further freeze in diplomatic relations.

• On-Field Provocations: The cricket itself became a proxy for these tensions. After India’s first match against Pakistan on September 14, Captain Yadav dedicated the victory to the Indian armed forces, directly referencing the Pahalgam attack. Pakistani players responded with their own symbolic gestures: pacer Haris Rauf mimicked shooting down aircraft, a reference to the May clashes, while opener Sahibzada Farhan celebrated a half-century by cradling his bat like a machine gun—a gesture that deeply upset Indian fans given the nature of the Pahalgam attack.

• The Naqvi Factor: India specifically questioned Mohsin Naqvi’s dual role as a Pakistani minister and a supposedly neutral ACC official. When the Indian team refused to shake hands after an earlier match, Naqvi took to social media, calling it a “lack of sportsmanship” and stating, “There is nothing more important to me than the honor and prestige of my country.” This cemented the Indian view of him as a political figure first and a cricket administrator second.

Cricket Diplomacy: A Fading Legacy?

The current animosity stands in stark contrast to a history where cricket was often used as a bridge between the two nations. The concept of “cricket diplomacy” was pioneered by Pakistan’s President Zia-ul-Haq in 1987, who visited India to watch a match during a period of high military tension.

Subsequent decades saw iconic moments of camaraderie. In 1999, after a Pakistan victory in Chennai, Indian fans gave the visiting team a standing ovation. In 2005, Pakistani President Pervez Musharraf and Indian Prime Minister Manmohan Singh watched a match together, and in 2011, Singh invited Pakistani PM Yousuf Raza Gilani to watch a World Cup semifinal in a powerful gesture of goodwill.

Analysis: An Inevitable Collision?

Experts suggest that Sunday’s events, while dramatic, were predictable. “It is often said that international politics and sports should remain separate, but in reality, this is easier said than done,” said Mathew John Moolakkattu, a researcher on cricket diplomacy.

“Given the ongoing tensions, it was perhaps inevitable that these strains would surface in arenas that connect both nations, such as cricket,” Moolakkattu explained. He pointed to Captain Yadav’s announcement that he would donate his match fees to the Indian Army as another sign of the game’s politicization.

The Indian stance, he argues, reflects a broader government policy to distance itself from Pakistan on all fronts until it perceives a definitive change in Pakistan’s approach to cross-border militancy—an allegation Islamabad consistently denies.

Ultimately, the image of a champion team celebrating without its trophy is a potent symbol of a fractured relationship. While the Indian team will eventually receive the silverware, the manner of its non-presentation has already written a controversial new chapter in the long and complicated story of India-Pakistan cricket, one that underscores how deeply politics can penetrate even the most cherished of sporting contests.

Support Dawat Media Center

If there were ever a time to join us, it is now. Every contribution, however big or small, powers our journalism and sustains our future. Support the Dawat Media Center from as little as $/€10 – it only takes a minute. If you can, please consider supporting us with a regular amount each month. Thank you
DNB Bank AC # 0530 2294668
Account for international payments: NO15 0530 2294 668
Vipps: #557320

  Donate Here