Moscow’s Geopolitical Gamble: Challenging Washington in South Asia

Recent Russian political maneuvers—most prominently President Vladimir Putin’s official visit to India and pragmatic engagement in Afghanistan—signal a strategic recalibration aimed at reshaping the balance of power in South Asia. This unfolds at a time when the United States is navigating a complex repositioning amid competing regional and global priorities. Moscow’s actions are not solely a response to Western pressures arising from the war in Ukraine; they reflect a broader strategy to leverage the international environment, craft alternatives to the unipolar order, and capitalize on American hesitation in managing intricate regional balances.

The Russia–India partnership remains a cornerstone of Moscow’s strategy to maintain influence in one of Asia’s most strategically significant regions. With its considerable political, economic, and military weight, India is an indispensable actor in any emerging regional architecture. Despite U.S. efforts to encourage New Delhi toward a firmer stance against Moscow, India continues to preserve a wide margin of autonomy in defense and energy relations. This highlights the limitations of traditional American leverage over rising powers and underscores a gradual shift from rigid alliance structures toward more flexible, multipolar arrangements.

For Moscow, India represents a strategic pillar for breaking Western isolation—not only through sustained military cooperation but also via deepening political and economic engagement that ensures Russia remains a key regional player. Moscow also benefits from Washington’s relative delay in balancing its relations between India and Pakistan, providing Russia with greater operational latitude in South Asia, even as Washington focuses on strengthening Indo-Pacific frameworks without fully integrating India into its security architecture.

In Afghanistan, Russia has adopted a pragmatic approach that acknowledges the post-U.S. withdrawal realities. Moscow has established direct channels with the Taliban to enhance cooperation on counterterrorism, border security, and narcotics control. Direct engagement with the Taliban provides Russia with tangible benefits—mitigating cross-border security threats, consolidating influence in Central Asia, and leveraging the Afghan dossier in future negotiations with Western powers. This dynamic reflects a geopolitical vacuum created by Washington, allowing regional powers—including Russia, China, and Iran—to expand their footprint in a region long dominated by U.S. influence.

These developments directly affect the delicate balance within the Russia–India–China triangle. India requires Russian support to maintain military superiority vis-à-vis Pakistan and strengthen deterrence against China, while simultaneously advancing technological and maritime security cooperation with the United States and the West. This complex interweaving of interests provides Moscow with strategic maneuverability and constrains U.S. containment strategies vis-à-vis China, while supporting the global trend toward a multipolar economic order through initiatives such as BRICS.

Conversely, Pakistan faces a more constrained strategic environment. The strengthening Russia–India partnership heightens Islamabad’s security concerns, particularly amid the continued flow of advanced Russian military hardware to India. Moscow’s limited engagement with Pakistan increases Islamabad’s reliance on China and compels it to recalibrate relations with the United States to avoid strategic isolation. In the absence of a coherent U.S. policy on managing India–Pakistan dynamics, Pakistan faces limited options requiring careful balancing and strategic flexibility.

The region is increasingly characterized by flexible multipolarity and geopolitical realignment, where influence is no longer monopolized by a single power, and alliances are fluid rather than fixed. The critical question remains: can Washington adapt to these rapid shifts, or will Moscow, supported by its Asian partnerships, successfully redefine the regional balance of power?

Potential Scenarios:

1. Sustained flexible trilateral cooperation including the United States:
India maintains its role as a balanced partner, preserving flexibility in relations with Russia and the West. In this scenario, Washington leverages partnerships with Gulf states to reinforce its regional influence over economic and security policies, maintain operational presence, and manage the maneuvering space of Moscow and Beijing while safeguarding vital interests.

2. Formation of a cohesive trilateral axis:
Enhanced cooperation among Russia, India, and China could facilitate alternative regional balances, constraining U.S. influence and highlighting multipolarity. Nonetheless, Washington remains a significant actor through its traditional alliances and economic diplomacy with Gulf states, though it cannot fully dictate the trajectory of regional balances.

3. Disruption of trilateral cooperation due to India–China tensions:
Heightened India–China tensions may drive New Delhi closer to Washington for defense and strategic cooperation, restoring a measure of U.S. influence in South Asia. Russia’s leverage in the region would remain limited, while the United States would benefit from strengthened alliances with India and Gulf states to manage regional alignments and achieve strategic balance.

Conclusion:
South Asia stands at a strategic crossroads. Moscow is consolidating its partnership with India and expanding its influence in Afghanistan and Central Asia, laying the groundwork for a multipolar regional order. Meanwhile, Washington, supported by alliances with India and Gulf states, seeks to maintain influence amid rapid shifts. The contest extends beyond mere influence—it is a recalibration of the regional power map. Alliances are no longer static, and influence is no longer concentrated in a single actor. The central question remains: will Washington adapt, or will Moscow succeed in scripting a new chapter in the region’s history?

Dr.Ubaidullh Burhani
Author: An American academic of Afghan descent and a member of the editorial board of the White House platform, Washington, D.C.
Original Publication: Arabic version published on the White House platform, Washington, D.C.

Washington and Kabul: U.S. Strategy Amid Regional Influence and

Our Pashto-Dari Website

  Donate Here