Venezuela’s Crisis: An Unignorable Warning to the Arab World

What unfolded in Venezuela over the weekend is not an isolated incident, nor should it be treated as such. It is a clear signal, one that deserves careful reading, not an emotional reaction, and is a defining moment that exposes the fragile reality of the international order we inhabit today. It is a stark illustration of a world where power increasingly trumps principle.

On Saturday, the US carried out a direct military operation on Venezuelan soil, resulting in the arrest of President Nicolás Maduro and his transfer to America to face criminal charges. This was not the result of a multilateral decision, nor the conclusion of an international judicial process. It was a unilateral act, executed by force, and rationalized under the expansive doctrine of “national security.”

The message is unmistakable and chilling: there are no absolute guarantees, and state sovereignty is conditional when it clashes with the interests and political will of a powerful state.

If the accusations against Maduro were of a strictly legal nature, fundamental questions arise: Why were the established mechanisms of international law bypassed? Why was the International Criminal Court not utilized? Why were formal complaints not submitted, evidence examined transparently, and due process followed? The precedent set is that a state can unilaterally declare another’s leader a criminal, then act as police, judge, and jailer—all on foreign soil.

By circumventing international legal institutions, the US has effectively taken international justice into its own hands. In doing so, it has not only violated Venezuela’s sovereignty but has also profoundly undermined the very rules-based system it claims to champion. This sets a dangerous and destabilizing precedent. If one power can ignore international mechanisms with impunity, what moral or practical authority remains to restrain others from doing the same?

The US is not the only global power. China, Russia, India, Pakistan, and others possess significant military and strategic capabilities. If unilateral action becomes an accepted norm, who will adjudicate the next intervention carried out under the convenient banners of “security,” “justice,” or “humanitarian concern”? This is why Venezuela matters profoundly—not because of sympathy for a particular regime or leader, but because the foundational rules of the game are being unilaterally rewritten by force.

The international response has been telling. The UN met. Statements were delivered. Concerns were voiced. But beyond rhetoric, there was no decisive action. This familiar pattern of paralysis sends a clear message to the watching world: raw power overrides collective principle, and accountability is selective. When international institutions fail to act decisively against clear breaches of sovereignty, they do not preserve stability; they actively erode it, incentivizing further unilateralism. Even warnings from UN bodies that such actions make the world less safe were met with indifference. This silence is not neutral; it is profoundly consequential.

President Donald Trump has repeatedly stated that Greenland is vital to US national security. If perceived security interests now justify extraterritorial military intervention and regime capture, it is reasonable—indeed, urgent—to ask: Should the world expect similar logic to be applied elsewhere? Which nation, whose leader, could be next?

This is not alarmism. It is the logical outcome of a world in which law is subordinated to the interests of the powerful. The uncomfortable question we must ask, honestly and without illusion, is this: In such a world, who is truly safe?

Despite this grim reality, we must be clear about one thing: we are not powerless. Our fate is not preordained by the actions of others. The Arab world possesses immense human capital: scientists, innovators, thinkers, and leaders who have contributed significantly to global progress when given the opportunity. Our historical challenge has never been a lack of talent or potential. It has been a chronic lack of consistent, transparent, and forward-looking structures that protect, empower, and retain that talent.

Our most successful Arab economies and societies were not built through perpetual dependence on external powers. They were built on our land, by our people, through vision, discipline, and relentless long-term planning. This is not theory; it is lived experience. True independence and security do not come from slogans or reactive diplomacy. They are forged from knowledge, strong institutions, strategic autonomy, and the unwavering ability to make sovereign decisions without fear or external coercion.

So, what must be done? The time for a strategic Arab recalibration is now.

First, we must transform the Arab League from a forum into a fortress. The Arab League must move decisively beyond symbolism and declaratory politics. It requires a fundamental evolution into a credible, integrated political, economic, and security framework with tangible mechanisms for collective defense and deterrence. This means establishing mutual security guarantees, integrated early-warning systems, and a unified diplomatic playbook to confront external pressure. A bloc that cannot project the will and capability to protect the sovereignty of its own members will not be respected by others. Our collective voice must carry the weight of collective consequence.

Second, we must repatriate Arab capital and secure strategic assets within the region. Recent global events have proven a brutal truth: assets and wealth held abroad are politically vulnerable. The freezing and seizure of sovereign and private assets following geopolitical conflicts stand as a stark reminder that political decisions can overturn legal ownership overnight, regardless of prior assurances or treaties. Economic sovereignty begins at home—through massive, coordinated regional investment in the pillars of resilience: food security, water management, energy interconnectivity, strategic industry, and indigenous technology. This is not isolationism; it is the highest form of strategic prudence in an unpredictable world.

Third, we must forge unity through vigilance and cultivate trusted leadership. Unity is not a sentimental ideal; it is a strategic necessity for survival. Arab states must systematically coordinate foreign policies, close ranks on core issues, and relentlessly reinforce internal social and political cohesion. Simultaneously, it is imperative to scrutinize those in the innermost circles of power, ensuring that only those with unwavering loyalty to national and pan-Arab interests—free from foreign allegiances or conflicting agendas—hold influence. History teaches us, time and again, that internal division and compromised counsel are often more destructive than any external threat.

Venezuela is not an exception. It is a piercing warning siren. We are entering an era where international guarantees are fragile, multilateral institutions are weakened, and the language of power speaks decisively louder than the whispers of principle. In this new landscape, awareness and strategic foresight are not luxuries; they are the fundamental requirements for survival and dignity.

Those who understand the shifting tides of the world and prepare with wisdom, courage, and unity will endure and thrive. Those who cling to outdated assumptions, reliant on protections that may vanish when most needed, may not be given another opportunity to correct course.

The lesson for the Arab world is clear and urgent. The time for decisive, collective action is now.

Our Pashto-Dari Website

  Donate Here