The West’s “Solutions”: A Brutal Calculus of Externalized Costs

What does it feel like to constantly wake to a world that has been quietly, ruthlessly, inverted? To feel the ground of your own reality—the principles you were raised on, the ideals you believed were permanent—crumble into dust beneath your feet? This is not mere disorientation; it is a profound moral and existential rupture. Millions, tens of millions, now gaze upon the landscape of the 21st century and recognize the grand narrative of progress, justice, and shared humanity for what it truly was: a dazzling, persuasive mirage.

These are not just uncertain times; they are horrific times. And the promised future is more horrifying still. We stand at the precipice of a final, total surrender of the self. As of tomorrow, the last vestiges of private life will be ingested by the latest artificial intelligence—every memory digitized, every preference mapped, every vulnerability cataloged. There will be no red lines left. A new, unelected aristocracy of tech oligarchs, operating in seamless synergy with intelligence apparatuses, will wield this intimate knowledge with impunity. Their objectives—profit, control, geopolitical dominance—will be pursued using the raw material of our very lives, while we, the data-serfs, stand powerless before a regime that has surgically elevated itself above the law.

For law now applies only to the weak: to citizens too disorganized to resist and to “foreigners” who live under a perpetual specter of arbitrary arrest or deportation on the flimsiest of suspicions. The two institutions designed to check this descent—the judiciary and the free press—have been systematically dismantled.

First, the judiciary has been hollowed out. In some so-called democracies, it has been packed with political operatives in robes, acting as false witnesses who rubber-stamp state overreach. Elsewhere, dignified judges who dare to resist now do so in fear, their families threatened by the rampages of extremist mobs unleashed by the very rhetoric of division the state tolerates or encourages. The bulwark is now a brittle facade.

Second, the media, the essential fourth estate, has been co-opted, consolidated, and gagged. Monopolies born of endless mergers now dictate the narrative. Thinkers are stifled, researchers marginalized, and outlets blackmailed into compliance or bypassed entirely. In their place, generative AI churns out convincing, agenda-driven content—a cheap, limitless substitute for experienced journalists and a death knell for accountable truth-telling.

Thus, the engine for dialogue stalls and the safety valve sealing pressure from political gridlock is welded shut. Without a watchdog or a independent court, gridlock decays directly into clashes, strife, and the quiet violence of disenfranchisement.

The evidence of this systemic shift is everywhere, written in the harsh policies targeting the most vulnerable.

In Britain, recent reports transcend the already alarming political and military support for Israel’s actions in Gaza. They reveal something more existential at home: the Labour government, adopting the terminology of Likud, has revived and expanded frameworks from the Tony Blair era for denaturalization and revocation of residency. Millions of naturalized citizens and residents of migrant origin—particularly from the Islamic world and the Global South—now live with the vulnerable possibility of being stripped of their right to stay. This comes as both the Conservatives and Labour, in a craven bid for votes, race to adopt the rhetoric of the ascendant racist right, legitimizing a xenophobic agenda that now threatens to undo citizenship itself.

Across the Channel, the situation mirrors and magnifies this crisis. The racist right in France, the Netherlands, and Germany no longer lurks on the fringe but shapes mainstream policy, its anti-immigrant platforms becoming de facto government agendas. Europe is fortressing itself, not with values, but with walls, legal barriers, and a chilling bureaucratic machinery of exclusion.

Meanwhile, in the United States, the project of imperial management continues unabated. The White House beats the drums of war against Venezuela, cloaking resource-hungry interventionism in the antique doctrine of an “American backyard.” With the largest proven oil reserves in the world at stake, the pretext of “combating drug trafficking” thinly veils the countdown to a potential invasion. This ambition fits a broader pattern: the demand for Canada’s subservience, the covetous gaze on Greenland, and the active attempts to pull Italy, Hungary, Poland, and Austria away from the European Union all speak to a project of hemispheric and global re-domination.

The cynicism is laid bare in the contrast with Argentina. As Venezuela is threatened for its “economic mismanagement” under a leftist regime, the U.S. pledges $40 billion to support the far-right, anarcho-capitalist government of Javier Milei—a man who would have faced electoral humiliation without such generous foreign backing. The calculus is transparent: pliant regimes are rewarded, defiant ones are slated for destruction.

This external aggression is matched by a terrifying internal decay. As former Secretary of Commerce Robert Reich tirelessly notes, the accelerating chasm of wealth has crippled the nation’s economic foundation. With 70% of the economy reliant on consumer spending, and wealth hyper-concentrated in the hands of the top 10%, the majority can no longer spend enough to sustain the system. Senator Bernie Sanders recently highlighted the obscenity: since the last election, billionaires like Musk, Ellison, Bezos, and Zuckerberg have seen their fortunes swell by hundreds of billions collectively, while 60% of Americans live paycheck to paycheck.

This inequality is lethally compounded by the rise of AI, which eliminates jobs even as the costs of food, housing, and healthcare soar. Each year, over half a million Americans are bankrupted by medical bills—a form of societal violence virtually nonexistent in other advanced nations. The 2025 National Security Strategy completes this grim portrait by explicitly framing mass migration—a phenomenon driven in no small part by the very climate chaos and economic destabilization Western policies exacerbate—as a primary threat to be militarily managed.

This is the brutal formula: The West “fixes” its problems at others’ expense. It exports its crises—of inequality, political instability, and resource scarcity—through militarism, economic coercion, and scapegoating. It patches the crumbling edifice of its own democracy by eroding rights within and projecting violence without. It seeks to sustain an unsustainable concentration of wealth by seizing resources abroad and silencing dissent at home. The mirage has faded. What remains is the stark reality of a system preserving itself by consuming everything in its path—the rights of its citizens, the sovereignty of nations, and the very future of a habitable, just world. We are not witnessing a stumble, but a deliberate and devastating course of action.

Our Pashto-Dari Website

  Donate Here